I 'm bad - I 'm nationwide! : Utah IMC

If you dare cross this Momma's Boy, I'll post pictures of guns found on the internet. You'll see!

I also trade kiddie porn. Let's talk.

nessie@sfbg.com

Little Johnny was in his 5th grade class when the teacher asked the children what their fathers did for a living. All the typical answers came up --- fireman, policeman, salesman, etc...

Little Johnny was being uncharacteristically quiet and so the teacher asked him about his father. "My father's a welfare queen who frequents gay bars. Sometimes, if he gets lucky at closing time and he catches the eye of someone desperate, and if the offer's fair, he'll go out to the alley with some guy and make love with him for money."

The teacher, obviously shaken by this statement, hurriedly set the other children to work on some coloring or Play-Doh, and took Little Johnny aside to ask him, "Is that really true about your father?

"No," said little Johnny, "He's an editor at the SF-IMC, but I was too embarrassed to say that in front of the other kids."

Ooooh, I just love mindless slogans. I think I just ejaculated.

Something's missing. It needs pathological lies, crowing about non-existent "credibility", spam about COINTELPRO, buzzwords suitable to a highly suggestive adolescent audience, warm fuzzies and huzzahs over dead Communist child predators, hogwash about cogent analysis by "authentic journalists", threats of violence, pictures of guns, "an ad hominem is not a rebuttal", and the ubiquitous bedwetting xeroxes about forgeries with "make a shorter link".

nessie continues to wow 'em, with it's sterling reputation. BwaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahaha

Interesting article. But including/citing Sf Indymedia was a bit strange. That was a republished article from elsewhere – the link to the original seems dead though. And no one pays attention to anything Nessie and co. at SF Indymedia have to say – that imc is, deservedly, a graveyard.

I really doubt you are the real Nessie, but your are just as fucking self-righteous and insane. Nutter.

on edit now that I think about it, I bet you aren’t nessie at all and probably agree with me but just wanted me to air one of the many problems with said douchebag

what have you done to end suffering in the world
have you gone to Iraq to rebuild the country. have you
sent money to keep the damn rednecks in the south where they belong? NO, then don't bore me!

I write to my little pal Bob every day I send his parents $5 a month to cover medical expenses. I do MY damn part how about you!

Wow! Only 5 bucks a month? Trading in lice futures apparently doesn't add much to your portfolio.

I don't march in the streets with the skanky A.N.S.W.E.R. garbage in order to prop up dictators. I don't have a Mao motif in my home. I'm not a human shield faker who turns tail and runs when I'm told I have to hang around the not so glamorous military installations or broadcast towers instead of schools and hospitals, (which I knew was never a target to begin with). I haven't turned a blind eye to Africa like the supposed "human rights" mewlers. I spoke out about Muslim women being driven back into a burning building when the supposed champions of womyn's rights didn't.

If I were in Iraq helping rebuild, I'd be accused of being with Halliburton, a favorite word with the sloganeering fuckwit clan. There's just no winning with raw Leftist sewage who cheered four Americans who were dragged through the streets of Fallujah.

So what do self loathing hate filled hippies who are too stupid to know the history of Communism and Socialism and Fascism truly do to end suffering in the world?

See:

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2005/10/137433_comment.php#138172

Without clicking on that link, my instincts tell me that it leads to yet another xeroxed piece of spam about COINTELPRO and roorbacks and black propaganda, and whatever else a poor paranoid megalomaniacal filler writer/pathological liar can conjure up.

This one is a masterpiece in abject idiocy, a hate filled screed against cops, scrivened by a bitter felon.

How long before it comes to claim it's been altered? How long before it tries to change the subject and blame it on Zionists?!?

When Tip was murdered, one of his human companions became quite understandably hysterical. Her name is Janet. She wasn't trying to hurt anybody. She was just screaming. She couldn't have hurt anybody if she wanted to. She was recovering from hip surgery, and was only able to walk with a cane and great difficulty. The cops wrestled her to the ground and restrained her. In the process, one of them broke his own sunglasses. So Janet was charged with assaulting an officer.

When I heard about this, I made it my business to be at the so-called “Hall of Justice” at 850 Bryant St. when Janet showed up for her first hearing. I interviewed her and two other witnesses. I have refrained from publishing it until now because I didn't want to jinx her case. Eventually, a judge threw the case out, but not before the ordeal had extracted time from Janet's life, and caused her a great deal of worry. As the SFPD take such joy in reminding the people they bust on bunk charges, you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride.

Some people would consider Chuck, Janet, and Dusty to be homeless people. Actually, they are vehicle dwellers. Their home is on wheels. The day Tip was shot, they were parked close to a dog park, along with a number of other similar vehicles. It is technically illegal to live in a vehicle on the street in SF. The loophole is you only have to move every 72 hours. There are several communities of vehicle dwellers in SF. They comprise a couple hundred individuals. They tend to look out for each other. They have to. The police push them around. All too often, the police murder their dogs, just because they can. All too often, the police also murder dogs who are companions of the truly homeless people, the ones who live on the sidewalk and under the bridges. While this happens fairly often, it is seldom if ever reported in the media. On the rare occasions that a middle class dog and the police tangle, it's news for days. Ask Max Castro, of San Francisco's Sunset District, or the Smoak family of North Carolina.

There are said to be ten to twenty thousand homeless people in SF. My guess is there are a lot more, and they just hide. There are a great many other people who are technically not homeless because they couch surf. My guess is based on personal experience. Giving away 1600 pounds of food every Thursday morning for six years in the eighties brought me into contact with a lot of hungry people. They included homeless people, couch surfers, vehicle dwellers and just plain poor people who have somehow managed to still hold onto their rooms and apartments. There are many of different kinds of poor people. They have little in common but poverty. But that's enough. Poverty is a full time job. Among the homeless, women are in the majority, a lot of them with children. You don't see them because they hide.

Back in the day, many vehicle dwellers drew a class distinction between themselves and the people who sleep in the bushes. Consistent and uniform persecution by the police has eroded this attitude by blurring the line between them. So has the increasing number of people who can’t afford to pay rent. Real estate speculation and Bush’s recession have made rent an unaffordable luxury for even many working poor. Then there’s the cops. If they tow your vehicle, it’s gone, and everything you own with it. you’re “kicked to the curb,” as the saying goes, and have to start over from nothing. None of Tip’s friends draw the distinction between those who live on wheels and those who live on their feet. Poor is poor. All poor people are in ever so slight variations of the same predicament. All are persecuted by the police. So are their dogs.

When you think of homeless people, you tend to think of disheveled winos, begging on the street. They are the ones you see, because they are the ones who don't hide. They are the tip of the iceberg. Far more common are people like Chuck and Janet, who are neither disheveled nor substance abusers, and their friend Dusty, who despite the moniker is clean and well dressed, and who is in recovery.

Tip was Chuck's dog, or rather, Chuck was Tip’s person. Chuck is Janet's significant other. Dusty is often their neighbor. Chuck, Janet and Tip were a family of three. Now they are just a grieving couple. For a living, they scavenge scrap metal. It pays only slightly better than welfare, and takes up a lot of time. But you don't have to punch a clock, or take orders from a boss. To some people, that's worth more than money. Scavenging is good exercise, too. It keeps Chuck in shape. I wish I looked as healthy as he does. The guy is built like a line backer. His size alone made the point in the narrative where he breaks down be a particularly heart rending moment. I gave him a big hug when it was over.

My connection with Tip is my friend Jane. Chuck saved Jane's life once. She made friends with him and Janet. Tip made friends with her. He was a very friendly dog. He made many, many friends. Most were poor. That's why he died the way he did. Rich people's dogs don't die this way.

Jane can't keep a dog where she lives, and she can't afford to move. She has a real deal on housing, and in this town, that's not something one walks away from. Rent is very expensive here. When you have a deal, you stick with it, or you have to leave town. New rentals are through the roof.

When Tip was alive, and Jane was feeling depressed, she would borrow Tip and they would go walking. He always cheered her up. Sometimes she borrows my dog for the same reason. Dogs are good for this sort of thing. Mammalian emotions are contagious, and it is very easy to make a dog happy. A dog can feel much greater happiness than its little brain can hold. The rest spills out, and gets all over whoever is nearby and has feelings. They act as a sort of amplifiering happiness reflectors. If you are so devoid of feelings as to be unable to share a dog's happiness, you're a psychic cripple. Get help. If that doesn't work out, you can always get a job with the SFPD. They hire people like you. You'd fit right into their culture.

For years, Jane tried to introduce me to Tip, whom she assured me I would like a great deal. She told me all about his personality, and how smart he was, and all the tricks he did, and how many friends he had, and how friendly he was, and how much people liked him, and how much I would like him, and when would I come and meet him? But I always kept putting it off, and now it's too late.

I'll never get to see him catch a tennis ball on the fly and drop it into the wire panniers of a moving bicycle. I'll never get to see him run along side and untie the cyclist's shoelace as he ran. I'll never get to see him lift from Jane's shoulders the crushing weight of depression that medication could never touch. I'll never get to shake his paw or rub his belly or feel his soft, warm tongue on my cheek. He's dead and gone, murdered in cold blood by a cruel and heartless man.

But he's not forgotten. He lives in the hearts of those he left behind, and in the hearts of all who love dogs and justice more than they love the cops.

nessie quite fond of whining about "changing the subject", (same type spam as about "ad hominems"), until it suits him:

http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2004/05/14010_comment.php

"what's posted after is the original,"
by Oh, really? Sunday, Mar. 20, 2005 at 6:30 PM

Google's cache disagrees:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?C45B226BA

What is actually happening here is that Zionists are attempting to discredit one of their vocal critics. Since there is no honest way to do this, they have become so desperate as to have stooped to the only tactic more petty, pathetic and puerile than a spelling flame, the fake typo.

That’s the kind of people Zionists are, deeply and fundamentally dishonest. But what else can we expect from people whose ideology is based on ethnic cleansing? Remember, the Zionists are to Jews what Nazis are to Germans, an embarassment to an otherwise admirable people. They are also people who who learned their trade while in the literal employ the Nazis:

http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/04/120352_comment.php#120573

http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/05/127448_comment.php#127704

They have mastered the “Big Lie,” and are in many respects more Nazi than the Nazis themselves. The only thing holding them in check, and keeping the body count of their victims so low, is their numerical paucity. But make no mistake about it, they have imposed upon the people of the so-called “West Bank” is their own version of the Warsaw Ghetto.

They take particular pains to counteract criticism from the left, because it puts lie to their claim that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.

And so, they put words into our mouths. Putting words into the mouths of one’s enemies is called in the trade, “black propaganda.” It’s a very, very old trick:

http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/1555696_comment.php#1555703

The culprit in this case is probably David Gehrig, a prolific Zionist mole based in UC-IMC, who appears to be pathologically obsessed with “nessie,” probably because, as “one of the editors” at SF-IMC, “nessie” banned him from using the site to spout his vile, racist, war mongering ideology of ethnic cleansing and colonialism. He also claims to not be a spammer.

Or maybe it’s IMC’s long time nemesis, SmashTheLeft, who apparently considers “nessie” to be his own, personal white whale.

Whoever the culprit is, he’s a proven liar. So take what he says with a large grain of salt.

Click here:

http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/07/1699507.php

The Google cache doesn't lie, but it does. Draw your own conclusions.

============================

http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2004/05/14010_comment.php

"what's posted after is the original,"
by Oh, really? Sunday, Mar. 20, 2005 at 6:30 PM

Google's cache disagrees:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?C45B226BA

What is actually happening here is that Zionists are attempting to discredit one of their vocal critics.

(SNIP inserted here. Note the attempt to change the subject)

http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2005/02/17333_comment.php

"What a guy"
by you betcha Tuesday, May. 10, 2005 at 8:30 AM

The Google cache lies. See what he *really* wrote:

http://www.transbay.net/~nessie/

http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/

http://makeashorterlink.com/?M65521BBA

Who are you going to believe, someone who does this:

http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2003/11/10972_comment.php#18185

http://makeashorterlink.com/?N18F232D8

http://makeashorterlink.com/?H216257C8

or someone who does this:

http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/

http://www.transbay.net/~nessie/

http://makeashorterlink.com/?C20E2233B

We have two choices here.

One is an obvious troll, who makes no bones that's what he is. He's never pretended to be otherwise. He has prolifically stated that he's here to skullfuck nessie.

The other is nessie, a childish mental cripple, a talentless filler writer who for years has tooted it's horn about being a "journalist", though it has no bona fides beyond some alternative used asswipe, the likes of which you can get for fishwrap on the way out the door of Sam Goody's.

He's a known and highly chronicled spammer. He's a known and highly chronicled liar. When confronted, (as for example right on this page), of his lies and duplicity, then he tries to demonize the messenger.

He asked "who are you going to believe". Well, I'm the troll, and I admit it, and I didn't pull some incredibly idiotic stunt by linking to yet another page and say I'd answer only if a gun was held to my head..

What has he ever admitted to?

And that's his good side:

http://www.sfimc.net/news/2002/11/1546540_comment.php#1693585

Is that your defense? All you can do is post that, a xeroxed piece that's years old? Can't you type out something on your own?

By the way, how's your journalism coming along? Don't you think I'm taking a lot of your precious time? Aren't you going to have some explaining to do to Sulzberger or Kinsley or Fang or Vega, et al?

Oh, I'm sorry. You're not a real journalist, are you? You just sit in the sandbox and pretend, ain't that right?

aHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahaHAHAhahaHAHAhahahHAHhah

like the ness-mister could ever pass for any kind of a reporter HA. that trash bin nessie runs, we joking refer to as the Ex-sf sight proves the lack of ability that exists

I consider it a sewer, myself. Or a storefront for NAMBLA.

where is nessie?
by mental cripple on autopilot Wednesday November 02, 2005 at 04:57 PM

C'mon, nessie, dig out your little thumbworn book of xeroxed links and post them. After all, you are SPECIAL, and this is your thread!

Don't tarry, little precious. The world awaits yet another short link, or a few paragraphs about COINTELPRO. Or maybe you can regale us about forgeries? Blame everything on Smashy? Spout some mindless adolescent slogans about "global justice", or misogyny, or of the terrible suffering of Palestinian terrorist sewage? (R.I.P. Arafat)

Or maybe you could just lecture us about lies and the liars who tell them, so tell us your life story. We have a minute to waste.

Hi. I'm nessie, Authentic Journalist. Since I'm such a sloganeering robotic fuckwit, and "Global Justice" is one of my idiotic adolescent buzzwords, why haven't I used my "talent" to go after the United Nations?

The same media obsessed with the death count in Iraq - 2,000 deaths isn't news, but the 2,000th death is - have never shown much interest in what is without question the biggest scandal in world history: the United Nations oil-for-food program.

Paul Volcker's final report on the U.N. program was also overshadowed by the recent indictment of White House aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby, charged with lying in an effort to hide a crime that was never committed.

What Volcker concluded was that Saddam was enriched by $1.8 billion with the aid of about 2,000 companies that helped him skirt economic sanctions and keep himself armed. The result was the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children who died of starvation or because they didn't get access to medicine - and more than 2,000 U.S. soldiers.

But it gets worse. Volcker's report concluded that Marc Rich - the man given the final pardon by President Bill Clinton even though he owed the United States millions of dollars in taxes and had fled the country - acted as a middle man for Saddam. It isn't a stretch to say that Rich has a lot of blood on his hands.

And does the name George Galloway mean anything to you? He is a British politician who has been relentless in his criticism of the war in Iraq. Turns out he was profiting as well from kickbacks from the oil-for-food program.

There were American companies involved in this scandal, but most could be found in France, Germany and Russia, which helps explains these countries' resistance to the war. Theirs was not a moral stance; instead they were motivated by greed and fear of exposure.

Nothing will be done because the U.N. does not have the power to go into these countries and pluck out the offenders and prosecute. A bit of indignation is in order, but for whatever reason that hasn't even been managed.

Not only is nessie a NAMBLA sympathizer, it's also a dangerously mentally disturbed NAZI sympathizer. Note how someone brings up Martin Luther King, and nessie's insane correlation with Jews who were being exterminated. nessie the idiot bastard gives a pass to the Nazis, and instead whines about Jews who killed their guards!

nessie is without question one of the most dangerous sacks of subhuman filth on this planet. If ever anyone needed removal, it's Nazi sympathizing sewage.

(nessie is "history buff" and "heard it before"):

http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/05/130209_comment.php

Violent or Peaceful Protesting
by Caleb-Dain Matton Wednesday, May. 29, 2002 at 7:38 AM
caleb_dain@yahoo.ca

Is Pacifsm Flawed???

VIOLENT PROTESTING VS. PEACEFUL PROTESTING

IS PACIFISM FLAWED???

Henry David Thoreau once said, “The question is not about the weapon but the spirit in which you use it”. It is important to note that as a protestor I see peace as the ultimate ideology but the use of violence as an inevitable means to get us there.

Before I dwell into the absolute justifying of violent protesting over peaceful protesting, I feel obliged to make you aware that I am peaceful by nature. I am kind to all living things and treat all life with respect. However I cannot tolerate the scum that corrupts our world. And that is where I draw the line.

So how did I come to the conclusion that violence against the establishment is warranted? Well, I am one in a rare and exceptional few who have that kind of love towards the tens of thousands of humans who die daily that makes me unable to endure patiently the mass of evil and suffering. This may be misjudged and misinterpreted in connection with propaganda by the media who points to protesters as being thugs and troublemakers. However, the media makes no attempt to say that starving someone to death or forcing children to work in sweatshops is where the true violence lies.

I believe in God so I have thought real long and hard about my violent use towards whom and what I believe to be evil and I have found that Christians have long supported force for what they believe to be moral ends. From the time of the Theban Legions through the Crusades and right up to present day when Bishops bless nuclear submarines. The Bible recounts the story of David and Goliath and Jesus’ anger as he flipped over the tables of the moneychangers in the temple. These are all accounts of Christianity justifying force. Even the Vatican and Pope reaffirm the standing teaching that armed rebellion is indeed morally justified in case of prolonged and stubborn tyranny. “Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God”. -- Thomas Jefferson.
The great pacifist Ghandi was stumped when asked a question during the Second World War. He was asked what course of action should the Jews take while Hitler aims to exterminate them all. His response was inevitably non-pacified. He said that the Jews should conduct a mass suicide! What a violent solution! But what else could Ghandi have said? There is no passive response to a tyrant’s actions.
My beef against peaceful protestors began while at a demonstration. I saw a protestor smash a bank window (smash Capitalism). Out of the blue a peaceful protestor came over to cry about it and was yelling and ranting to the window-breaker. I rushed over and told the peaceful protestor that this lousy bank window was not worth demoralizing this human being over. That it was just glass, nothing more. I then threatened to break some windows myself and asked him what he would do about it. Walk away was all he could do. See that is the thing about peaceful protesting. Peaceful protestors are automatically thwarted into a dilemma.

As an analogy of dilemma let’s say your neighbour is a mean person who frequently comes over and beats the shit out of you. You take these beatings because of your passive ideology but one day you see your neighbour hop the other side of his property and begins to beat the shit out of his neighbour. What would a peaceful protestor do if he couldn’t call the police? He can’t pull his neighbour off. That is direct action. Does the peaceful protestor just hope that the beaten man is passive as well and can handle this beating? At any rate the peaceful protestor has a decision to make whereas I don’t. I would hop that fence in a jiffy and do some serious ass-kicking. No dilemma here.

It wasn’t hard for me to become active with a jump-started violent attitude when it comes to protesting. I think I used the simple logic that if there is a rock on the road, you can’t ask it to leave, you have to pick that little sucker up and physically move it. I sometimes wonder when watching ‘BraveHeart’ how effective William Wallace would have been if he held a sign that read, “English, Please Leave”

The funny thing about peaceful protestors is I watch them sit in one place and then the cops simply charge into them and they all get up and move somewhere else to sit. At least try to follow through on your passive resistance and stay in one place, dying if you have to. Watching you run and sit, and run and sit just makes me dizzy.

Also, peaceful protestors get clubbed and pepper-sprayed like crazy and think that people at home are going to sympathize with them if they don’t fight back. Get it through your heads. The image of you being beaten and not fighting back has already been showed. It isn’t going to save the world. These people at home are a waste of skin who are cozy playing golf and could give two shits about what happens to you; peaceful or not.

But I know for a fact that people who do want to join the cause would more likely fight to defend their lives, rather than allowing themselves to be beaten and punished.

The established elitists can be compared to a child. They will try to take what they want. They will touch things that are not theirs. They need to be reminded who the parent is. When a child touches something he shouldn’t and you respond with saying “No” for the first time, this child does not know what that word means. There has been no corresponding action to the word so he has nothing to fear from hearing it, hence all your colourful signs at the protests. It isn’t until you say “No” and show some kind of punishment at that instance whether it be a light tap on their hand or some “time out” that the child will then be able to recognize the implication of the word “No”. Now that the child knows that the word “No” displeases his motives will they finally begin to take your plea seriously. You have to treat those with reckless power in the same manner. They need to be scared. They need to be intimidated. They need to know what “No’ means. One million people carrying signs walking in circles outside my house would not scare me but one million people charging into my house about to kick my ass would. Can you correlate the difference?

I bleed, bruise and get battered for what I see is ethically and morally right to my standards. I do the opposite to what my enemy says. If he says he will only tolerate a peaceful protest, I make sure to give him the most violent protest I can muster. The politicians cry for peaceful protest and say they will only tolerate this. Do you really expect this will change their heart? Would you even trust any ruling power which is wise enough to make sufficient arguments on how you should or should not protest against them be wise enough to know that something in their structure is obviously wrong to be protested against in the first place? Peaceful protestors give them exactly what they want: Song and Dance and No Fight!!

It seems that the effectiveness of non-violence is enhanced when it stands out in sharp relief against a backdrop of actual violence. In other words non-violence needs violence in the same way that stars need the night sky to show themselves off. Non-violence is too simple. It is an easy way not to get yourself hurt or sacrifice pain for others. It is a scapegoat in having to not get your hands dirty. Anyone sitting at home watching TV can claim they are non-violent advocators. As history dictates itself, experience has shown that evil left unchecked does not eventually defeat itself or go away – you either fight it or feed it.

I choose to fight it in a world where action speaks louder than words and I will continue my absolute style of violent protest.

I realize not everyone can fight such as old ladies and those who are disabled and we need a voice that co-exists with their punishment so as long as you choose to remain peaceful, I ask that you don’t knock my ability or try to stop me in the middle of a protest.

On a final note, I don’t dislike peaceful protestors. After all, we are working for the same cause. I do disagree with your absolute peaceful methods just as you mine. But I feel secure in knowing that in time after being constantly ignored but beaten and constantly unnoticed but bruised you too will inevitably fight back. Caleb

caleb_dain@yahoo.ca

add your comments

Untitled
by Kristy Tuesday, Jun. 17, 2003 at 6:49 PM

Although I agree that violent protest is more effective than peaceful, I think it is hypocritical for you to write a good majority of your essay on why peaceful protesting is dumb, and then end your essay with, "...as long as you choose to remain peaceful, I ask that you don’t knock my ability ..." Isn't that what you just did to them?

add your comments

Non violent protests don't work.
by history buff Tuesday, Jun. 17, 2003 at 8:28 PM

Violent protests don't work, either. Protests don't work, period. Only direct action works.

The ruling class doesn't give a rat's patootie what we think. To them, we are nothing but livestock. If you don't believe me, read history.

add your comments

martin luther king
by maijer Sunday, Oct. 23, 2005 at 8:39 PM

like martin luher king said violent protesting is in moral n you'll only act like the oppresser who is oppressing you.....you are only doing what they are doing back to you......an eye for an eye ....and soon we'll all be blind!

add your comments

"in moral"
by heard it before Sunday, Oct. 23, 2005 at 10:32 PM

Tell that to the Jews who survived the Holocaust by killing their guards and burning Treblinka.

Nessie is gaggingly self-righteous, paranoid, conclusion-jumping, and authoritarian, a government agent, who uses provocateur tactics, and a false god, who is not where your salvation will come from, but is instead a poisonous snake, a soon to be deposed hater, a racist pig with an ex-lax jones, a dyke, a dork, a pathetic baffoon, an evil thug, a Nazi with an identity crisis, who is possessed by paranoid delusions, and is a dipshit, devoid of a moral spine, whom no one likes, who ate the Lindbergh baby, who advocates murder, while articulating his internal Disney-like reality, and who has been fired, and thrown out, to be replaced by a dyslexic monkey, even though he doesn't even exist, so somebody must believe that he really poses a threat.

Nobody, and I mean nobody, can copy and paste the same old stale crap from a thumbworn book of grievances like our Special Journalist ™.

>stale

See:

http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/style.htm

>nobody

See:

http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/attack.htm

not stale, eh?
by mental cripple stomper Friday November 04, 2005 at 06:06 PM