View article without comments
Overturning Roe v Wade Grounds for Civil War.
by Lloyd Hart
Thursday October 06, 2005 at 11:43 AM
dadapop@dadapop.com
You have the right to choose the course you will take and I advise you to choose wisely for there are a great deal more people that think like me then there are people that think like you.
Overturning Roe v Wade Grounds for Civil War.
Lloyd Hart 10/06/05
If the illegitimately elected president of United States stacks the Supreme Court with illegitimately appointed political hacks who then overturn Roe v. Wade doing away with a woman's freedom and right to choose, removing a woman's right to the sovereign control of her own body and therefore her own destiny, fundamentally reducing a woman's role in our society back to the status of chattel I will have no choice but to exercise my constitutional right to arm myself and declare a civil war in order to defend my wife, daughter and granddaughter from what is so obviously a tyrannical and lawless government.
Removing a woman's sovereign right to control her body and therefore her own destiny is absolutely on par with the practice of slavery in the United States that brought on the first American Civil War. Is absolutely on par with the removal of the Native American Rights of freedom of movement that led to the defeat of U.S. forces at the Battle of Little Bighorn.
No longer can I stand by and watch as this terrible assault on human-rights perpetrated by the lawless Bush regime continues. Now everyone will know what it will take for me to take up arms against this lawless gang of thugs in the White House. Sure there are plenty of crimes we can put them behind bars for right now but there is absolutely no political will in the ruling class in America to allow the information to flow to the public that would free the political forces in America to bring justice to these criminals. The ruling class have taken complete control of the ballot box and are rigging elections. The corporate media are lying to the public by omission and won't even address the facts that clearly point out the illegitimacy of the 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections. With the ruling elite spending the last 25 years radically increasing the cost of real estate and rents, radically increasing the cost of energy, home and transportation fuel for the sole purpose of squeezing us to maintain grotesque profits for their grotesque lifestyles what little economic democracy there was in America is gone.
When this political hack Harriet Miers is confirmed by the U.S. Senate and when she is sworn in as a associate justice to the Supreme Court, it is only a matter of time before Roe v Wade will be overturned. I will not be able to look my wife, daughter and granddaughter in the face without walking out the door and entering in open warfare with a criminal regime. It does however not require that you have women in your life in order to fight for women's rights it simply requires understanding the rule of law against the U.S. Constitution. "All "MEN" are created equal" and so too are WO"MEN" to men and vice versa. If you believe otherwise you are fostering a criminal mind and are my sworn enemy. And if you succeed in turning the very foundations of the institutions of the government of the United States against the women in my family I will have no choice but hunt you down, bring you to trial, jail you and if you will not surrender to the rule of law under the Constitution of the United States of America you will give me no choice but to kill you.
You have the right to choose the course you will take and I advise you to choose wisely for there are a great deal more people that think like me then there are people that think like you.
http://dadapop.com
dadapop.com
Better And Better
by Bound Too Long
Friday October 07, 2005 at 12:22 PM
For real Roe vs. Wade will be overturned?I had no idea the U.S.A. was that much on the high road.Impressive.Refreshing.Our friend Lloyd has apparently snapped because his fast,cheap,and easy method of birth control is about to have the wheels pulled off.Talk to the women and girls who regret having had the procedure done,Lloyd.From what I understand that includes all of them.
dear Loyd
by nessie
Friday October 07, 2005 at 02:01 PM
Why wait for that? You Collaborators - meaning terrorist fellators - have been given a pass for far too long as it is.
You wanna meet in the streets? We'd love nothing better than to see a river of hippie blood running into the sewer drains where it belongs.
Bring it on, Collaborator!
"by nessie Friday October 07, 2005 at 02:01 PM"
by this is a forgery
Sunday October 09, 2005 at 04:31 AM
For more about forgeries on Indymedia, see:
http://www.sfimc.net/news/2002/12/1555696_comment.php#1692248
For more about the *effects* of forgeries on Indymedia, see:
http://www.sbindymedia.org/newswire/display/2591/index.php
For the real nessie, click here:
http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/
http://www.transbay.net/~nessie/
http://makeashorterlink.com/?C20E2233B
For more about the forger, see:
http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2003/11/10972_comment.php#18185
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N18F232D8
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H216257C8
prove it's a forgery
by nessie
Sunday October 09, 2005 at 11:58 AM
Prove it's a forgery, since you can't even make up your mind whether the name is important or not, and since you've been caught posting to yourself many times and haven't denied it, and since you've bragged about publicity.
The words below are nessie's, and not one word has been changed, and he has never denied them.
----------------------------------------------------------
Those who are new around here should be aware that certain people have been forging my name to posts I didn’t write, in a pathetic attempt to discredit me. This is called “black propaganda,” and has a long, rich history.
See:
http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/07/138397_comment.php#138482
The way to tell if I actually wrote something is simple. If it sounds like something I wouldn’t say, it wasn’t.
To see what I really say, click here: http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/ http://www.transbay.net/~nessie/ http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/09/149993_comment.php#150095
(snip)
(1.) My name isn’t nessie.
(2.) But that has nothing to do with whether I can prove it. I can’t prove it. So what? That, doesn’t mean it’s not true. Personally, I don’t care whether you believe me or not. If you don’t believe me, then you’re not who I’m talking to. I’m talking people smart enough to know that when something that is inconsistent with the bulk of my writing comes signed with my name, it’s a forgery. Anybody who’s not smart enough to grasp that, wouldn’t understand what I was saying, anyway.
(3.) Besides, who it was that wrote something is irrelevant. Only content counts. If it’s true, it doesn’t matter who says it, or why. The truth is the truth, period.
(4.) Later, when you encounter something with my name on it, posted somewhere else on the internet, consider that it may be a forgery. If it is consistent with what you know I have actually written, then I wrote it. If it is not consistent, then it’s a forgery. If you can’t tell the difference, you’re too stupid to understand what I’m saying, anyway, so don’t waste time trying.
*snip*
It's not about the writing. It's about the name.
*snip*
But remember, if only the content counts, and if it's true, and if it doesn't matter who says it or why, then is it really a forgery? Educate yourself. Start today.
*snip*
My signature can only be trusted here:
http://sf.indymedia.org/
here:
http://www.transbay.net/~nessie/
and most of here:
http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/
"by nessie Sunday October 09, 2005 at 11:58 AM"
by no it wasn't
Sunday October 09, 2005 at 12:46 PM
Anyone who reads it can tell. So the question is, why would someone bother to forge "nessie's" name? What is the motivation for the massive smear campaign being waged against "nessie"? Is it pathology or a paycheck? Inquiring minds want to know.
slapping pathological child molesters around
by nessie
Sunday October 09, 2005 at 05:10 PM
Did you just say that anyone can tell, asswipe? Well then, let's let your idiot words speak for that too:
(4.) Later, when you encounter something with my name on it, posted somewhere else on the internet, consider that it may be a forgery. If it is consistent with what you know I have actually written, then I wrote it. If it is not consistent, then it’s a forgery. If you can’t tell the difference, you’re too stupid to understand what I’m saying, anyway, so don’t waste time trying. How about that, asswipe? You didn't seem to think anyone would know when you acted the pompous twit and expected them to, ain't that right? Damn, you have the intelligence and debating skills of shit. Pat yourself on the back for letting me kick you in the nuts yet again.
"by nessie Sunday October 09, 2005 at 05:10 PM"
by this is a forgery
Monday October 10, 2005 at 08:13 AM
See also:
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/1719065_comment.php#1720700
|